Adoption
Council resolution of 28 June 2023 on the application of the updated study. Technical draft by 03 Architekten, accompanied by the broad participation process „Hoch hinaus?" 2020–2021.
The updated High-Rise Study is Munich's central urban-planning instrument for assessing tall buildings. It defines where and under which quality standards the city may build upwards. This dossier summarises origin, content, current version and first practical experience — as of April 2026.
The Munich City Council adopted the study on 28 June 2023 and refined its wording in February 2025. It is now the binding framework for all high-rise projects in the city administration.
Council resolution of 28 June 2023 on the application of the updated study. Technical draft by 03 Architekten, accompanied by the broad participation process „Hoch hinaus?" 2020–2021.
Editorial adjustments in chapter 06, implementing the 28 June 2023 resolution. The study's structure and content remain unchanged.
The study does not impose a general 60-metre ceiling. It works with five height tiers whose admissible overshoot depends on the urban context.
The update took five years. The process was intensive, participatory — and has now been confirmed in court.
First formal presentation of the revised study. Trigger for the public debate on height development, site criteria and quality requirements.
An extensive participation process with residents, professionals and city society. Results fed into the revision of the study.
The High-Rise Study in the April 2023 version shall be applied as the urban-planning framework for all future high-rise projects.
Fine-grained editorial refinements. The underlying system of height tiers and quality criteria is unchanged.
The „HochhausSTOP" citizens' petition against the application of the study at the Paketpost site is finally ruled inadmissible. The study holds up in legal practice.
The study combines a spatial guidance plan with a qualitative criteria catalogue. Siting and quality are treated separately — but are inseparable.
For the entire city, the study assigns five height tiers. They define by how much a project may overshoot the eaves height of its surroundings — depending on urban context, topography and city-planning significance. A blanket height ceiling is explicitly not provided.
From building type 3 onwards, a binding catalogue applies with four top-level categories: urban design, architecture, societal added value, and climate & sustainability. It is the real innovation of the update and serves as the „yardstick" for approvability.
Integration into silhouette, street network, sight lines and neighbourhood structure. Density with measure.
Design quality, ground-floor zones, materiality. International competitions as the default.
Mixed use, subsidised housing, public space, access to shared infrastructure.
Embodied carbon, circular economy, microclimate, lifecycle energy balance.
Preliminary talks and feasibility study before initiating the zoning procedure. Site suitability and height-tier justification are tested in planning.
After the participation process, sustainability/climate and sight axes were deepened. The Feb. 2025 version is the authoritative one today.
The PaketPost site is the first major project at which the study was legally tested — and which it has passed.
The full council adopts the development plan with green-space ordinance. Core: two 155 m towers by Herzog & de Meuron, around 1,200 apartments, more than 3,000 jobs, 8,500 m² of greenery, retail, culture, social uses and a care facility.
The Bavarian Administrative Court of Appeal rules the „HochhausSTOP" citizens' petition finally inadmissible. Reason: the question was too indefinite — signatories could not tell to which specific measures the city would be bound in case of success.
The city announces in its daily bulletin: once the pending supplementary negotiations on subsidised housing (SoBoN) are completed, the development plan and land-use plan amendment can be published in the official gazette and take effect.
Planning law is effectively in place, the last procedural hurdles have fallen. A project start is legally possible within 2026. The study is thus confirmed both politically and in case law.
The study is a step forward — but not the endpoint. It is the framework in which Munich's high-rise debate will now move. Whether the framework holds will be decided in each individual application.
We welcome the clear system of height tiers and quality criteria, the integration of climate and sightline considerations and, not least, the judicial confirmation of the procedural logic in January 2026. What remains critical: the study does not in itself create more affordable housing — as long as the quality catalogue is not also used as a lever for binding social quotas and leaner procedures in actual approvals.
Criticism comes mainly from the Münchner Forum and initiatives such as Moloch München, who call for stricter ecological and social criteria and more binding height limits. We share the interest in honest, fact-based debate — but we trust in the quality of implementation, not in blanket prohibitions.
Primary sources and reporting on which this dossier is based.
Revised draft as of April 2023, document of the City of Munich (PDF, German).
Official page of the City of Munich on the High-Rise Study, with the Feb. 2025 version.
Background, the Herzog & de Meuron masterplan draft and development-plan status.
Decision of 19 January 2026 on the „HochhausSTOP" citizens' petition (brief).
The High-Rise Study is not the end of the debate — it is its starting point. Bring your perspective to one of our events or reach out directly.